What is the ‘Sharing Economy’- and how will it affect industry, workers?

Via: Source

Hilary Clinton made waves on Monday morning when she effectively called out the major players in the ‘sharing economy’; a new business model that uses contract labor, instead of traditional employees, to fulfill their services. The implications of this seemingly small legal distinction can be massive. The classic examples of the new ‘sharing economy’ companies are Uber and Air Bnb. In light of the varying press the undoubtedly massive, innovative companies have been amassing in recent days and weeks; we wanted to take a look at what this trend could mean on a macro level as we head into the future.

Uber and Air Bnb are fascinating companies for a number of reasons. Globally speaking, Uber is now one of the largest, private transportation companies that there is. But they own not a single car. And similarly, thousands of people now book rooms and houses across the globe via the Air Bnb app, yet they own not a single piece of property. And that distinction is far from the only one differentiating them from conventional companies.

They both use contract labor forces outside of their corporate headquarters. I.e., the Uber driver that picks you up is not a benefitted employee who works exclusively for Uber, as a cab driver for a traditional cab company would be. That Uber driver is a contract-employee, only working when they want to, but also not receiving any benefits that a traditional employee earns, like healthcare or retirement savings. Now, if you’re a college kid looking to earn a little extra money by renting out your room, or by driving people around in your car, this arrangement is perfectly fine.

Where it theoretically becomes dangerous is if these companies serve as a kind of starting point; rolling the metaphorical snowball down the hill towards a point where we are ALL contract employees, responsible for our own healthcare and retirement savings. This would represent a potentially dangerous step if it became the norm. What do you think? Is the sharing economy a slippery slope? Or is a it a non-issue, being used by politicians to garner attention for themselves? Let us know in the comments.

Epic, American news coming out of Comic Con

Via: Source

When news came out recently that Sylvester Stallone would be reprising his role of Rocky in what looks to be an actually awesome new movie, we were pretty pumped. But now, as news arrived this weekend fresh out of Comic Con that not only will Rocky be getting a revisit, but none other than the iconic RAMBO himself will ride again; this time against ISIS(!!!). Could be stupid. Or it could actually the one of the most epic action movies of all time, even if it’s all but guaranteed to be somewhat campy. This writer though, is hoping for the latter.

Rambo versus ISIS? It really could be too good to miss, even if the last time Rambo appeared on screen was in the disappointing 2008 turn, Rambo: Last Blood (aka Rambo 5. And, don’t forget the ironically beloved Expendables series). However, inserting ISIS as the villains this time around just might be enough to make it more than a little bit watchable. Details are scarce as of this writing, but the movie appears to be due out sometime in 2016. And personally, we can’t wait.

El Chapo on the run again; Trump responds

Via: Source

In a move that has already drawn the ire of Donald Trump, who said he would (hypothetically) ‘kick his ass’, notorious Mexican drug lord El Chapo has tunneled his way out prison. This marks the second time in 15 years that this guy has escaped from jail in Mexico.

As noted in the video, to say this guy simply ‘tunneled out’, would be a bit of an understatement. The thing was a mile long, and equipped with a special motorcycle (run for it? El Chapo? I don’t think so.). This whole thing makes even that prison break in upstate New York last month look like amateur hour. And, it’s only the latest in a long string of absurd, tunnel-related antics orchestrated by the notorious El Chapo.

Over his time as a drug lord, El Chapo became a pioneer of using tunnels to both smuggle drugs, and move unseen throughout the cities he operated in, mainly Culiacan, the capital of the state of Sinaloa. He first used a tunnel to escape jail in 2001, and was caught again in 2014 by Mexican marines after a 13 year manhunt.

The importance of this is magnified as it undermines much of the progress (at least in the court of public opinion) that Mexican Enrique Pena Nieto has made on the eradicating-drug syndicates front.

Any updates, including on whether or not Donald Trump was able to administer his ass-kicking will be updated here.

MUST SEE Wes Anderson event going down soon

While usually we would keep something this juicy, and already widely-attended to ourselves (just kidding, we would never do that to our readers–ALL the news that’s worth a reblog is our sacred mission here), we simply have to share this amazing event with our readers, mainly the NYC based ones.

This August, a Wes Anderson art show will be going down; and here’s the Facebook page with all the info.

Oh, HELL yeah to ALL that.

Anyway, if you’re not in NYC, hate Wes Anderson, hate us, or feel like you wasted a click on that, fear not dear reader; we have a classic Anderson clip to (hopefully) clear all the negativity (and to show you why his movies are some of the more unique and creative of the past 15 years). We love you. And, we hope to see some of there this August!

Oil glut could keep prices low into 2016

Via: Source

BUY! BUY! BUY! Renewable energy assets that is (or oil, I mean, why not right), as news comes out of the IEA that a world-wide glut of oil create stagnant prices for the foreseeable future. Indeed, since last November OPEC initiated a number of strategies with aim at curbing oil production in many competing, oil-producing countries. Especially those that get their oil from shale, by fracking, because the price margins on that practice are much, much narrower.

And it appears that those initiatives have been working as intended, because despite the on-set of the summer travel season and its usual bump in prices, international oil supplies are keeping those rates lower than in years passed. Basically, because the 12 countries in the OPEC syndicate can create oil at lower prices than their competitors, if they do not slow down production, other countries will be forced out of the oil business, and reliance on OPEC-produced oil will once again rise.

What would the consequences of this be? It’s hard to tell. Energy dependence is a tough spot for any sovereign nation to be in, but even if OPEC does manage to squeeze out much of its competition, how much would that drive up dependence on their products? As we stated at the beginning of this article, renewable sources of energy like wind, water, and solar are becoming more viable from an economic standpoint every day. Will those resources bridge the energy demand that OPEC seems to be stoking? What do you think? Let us know in the comments section.

Ellen Pao resigns as CEO of Reddit

Via: Source

When she first stepped in as interim CEO almost 2 years ago now, the decision was almost immediately controversial. Whether that was fair or not, is still up for debate in the eyes of most.

However, over those past 2 years, what has become less debatable, was how vocally the users of Reddit, who are amongst the most passionate (sometimes questionably so) communities on the internet, were beginning to speak out against her stewardship of the website.

The news of her resignation comes after what others have described as a full-scale user revolt took place, following the firing of a popular Reddit employee named Victoria Taylor, which many Reddit users attributed directly to Ms. Pao, often in vitriolic, sexist, or hateful ways (or all 3). A petition with over 200,000 signatures circulated around the site as well. As was previously mentioned, Reddit is a site with an incredibly passionate user base.

In terms of commentary on this sensitive subject, we would offer only this; the internet is a strange, roiling, and sometimes scary place. But the users of Reddit got their way, which although an unfortunate example, shows a positive side of the internet; the ability for people to organize themselves for a cause. Even if in this case it was a pretty mean-spirited one.

What is happening to the Chinese stock market?

Ah, China. Always an interesting case study on government intervention in markets. Still not fully emerged from their communist past, the government has seemingly applied an ‘if some is good, more is better’ type approach to market regulation and stimulation, which in years past has provided some pretty impressive results. As anyone who follows the markets even casually will tell you, China usually posts a GDP growth rate of roughly 8% per year, every year. This seemingly-impossible statistic has been questioned in the past, with investors wondering how much of that was propped up by the government. But the data coming out of China, and the ways international markets responded to that information, have always seemed to fall in line with that 8% GDP growth number.

Until recently that is. Starting in early June, the Chinese stock markets have been in an unprecedented state of turmoil, something international markets have not seen before. Let’s take a look at some of the reasons why, and what some of the consequences of this instability may be.

Which way will they slide?

China’s stock market is composed of two main indexes: the Shanghai and the Shenzhen. Since their high points in June the Shanghai is down 32%, and the Shenzhen is down 40%. To put this in terms that might be slightly more digestible to some of our readers, imagine the Nasdaq sliding 32% while the Dow beat even that slide at 40%. The Dow and Nasdaq are indeed both larger, but the comparison remains. It’s getting bad over there.

However, as noted by the WSJ, this slide essentially only mirrors the massive gains that the indexes had amassed over the 12 months, as Chinese equity markets turned incredibly hot over the past year, with both indexes breaching 150% value increases year-over-year. However, the market got so hot, that as more and more players got involved, people started buying equity on borrowed money; never an awesome idea, albeit a common one, eventually turning prices downward.

With state intervention, the markets seem to have stabilized a bit in the second half of this week, and government agents are now investigating reports of rampant short-selling that had been accumulating for months. Obviously though, this just may be short term relief. The roots of this crisis probably go back to the 2008 international one, where China lowered interest rates along with the rest of the world; although it appears here that investors turned their attention toward assets, and not property as was likely hoped.

In terms of what will happen next, or what the consequences of this recent instability will be, it is still undetermined. Analysts at Credit Suisse predict increasingly drastic action out of Beijing until something seems to click, but other commentators, such as Michael Pettis, a financial commentator and professor based in Asia, believes this is all part of a long-predicted slow down of the Chinese economy; from 8% annual growth, to around 3%. An action he believes, would cut asset prices almost in half. We’ll see how the indexes themselves respond to all this uncertainty in a few hours.

What would the consequences of a ‘Grexit’ be?

For years, financial analysts and political observers alike have been wondering about what the consequences of a ‘Grexit’, or, Greece leaving the EU, would be. Now that the Drachma has made its first appearance on receipts and other financial documents, it appears that this possibility is closer to reality than we had ever envisioned before. Indeed, in one of the most clear signs pointing firmly towards a Grexit, the ECB refused to raise their $89 billion loan cap, which has led to cash rationing amongst banks in Greece, which in turn, left Greece with only one option to prop up its financial sector; printing Drachmas. They are not legally entitled to print Euros. So in that spirit, let’s take a look at a couple of scenarios for what could very soon be the new reality (or not) of an independent Greece.

Could it be?

Best Case Scenario: Many, including Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz believe that leaving the Eurozone would cause Greece short term pain that would be worth it in the end. The Drachma would almost certainly be drastically devalued in the immediate-term, which would actually have a couple of positive effects on some portions of their economy (cheap olive oil, or Mykonos vacations sound nice to anyone out there?). On the other hand, bank accounts would be depleted while they were converted to less-valuable Drachmas. But over time, a light at the tunnel would develop. Advocates of this scenario, those who think they should leave, state that the country would remain around 25% unemployment under strict austerity terms, if they stay within the EU. However, the only historical model to really point to in terms of a country defaulting on its debts, is Argentina, which has posted mixed, but also many years of positive, economic results in the time since they did.

Worst Case Scenario: There are a lot of factors working against Greece if they do decide to leave the EU, and execute a currency change. Greece is not a large exporter, and is not necessarily poised to become one as Argentina was able to. Even the now-departed Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis stated that it would be hard for his country to mimic the export success of Argentina, which produces mass amounts of agricultural products. Also, the debts to the EU do not necessarily disappear, even if the Greek government decides to stop paying them. And paying them off in devalued Drachmas would prove even more difficult than it is now.

Truly a tough situation our Greek friends find themselves in. Check back here on the Daily Aggregator for more updates as this unique international story develops.

What the hell happened yesterday?

While there are a number of pressing business matters developing today, there were a few strange occurrences yesterday that we simply would feel remiss to not mention. Let’s dive in an take a look at all the oddities that went on this Tuesday.

As has been widely reported by many sources by this time, the New York Stock Exchange, the Wall Street Journal, and United Airlines all went down almost simultaneously.

Hackers?

When visitors attempted to access the WSJ website, they were greeted with only the dread 404 Error. United Airline flights were grounded for hours, sending passengers clamoring for other flights, trains, and busses. And at the NYSE, all trading was halted for a span of more than year hours. All three organizations are claiming that technical errors were the culprits, but the timing has led many to speculate that some how hackers were involved. Where these hacks would have originated, or what the motivations of the hackers would be, are all pure speculation at this point. In fact, Anonymous, the hacking group of debatable effectiveness, said cryptically in a tweet Tuesday night that they “Wonder if tomorrow is going to be a bad day for Wall Street…we can only hope.”

Do you think these events were caused by hackers? If so, do you think they were related? What do you think they were trying to accomplish if the outages were caused by hackers? All we know at this point is that a very curious series of events took place yesterday, although all the organizations seem to be back up to full functionality once again.

We will update this story if there are any further developments.